Munich Re.
Munich Re owns the capacity story.
Found & recommended by AI agents
Search-class agents touched the close in some runs; the full agent-fleet access profile lands in a later wave.
This page measures the commerce lane: can an agent find Munich Re, and once it arrives, transact. Talent, after-sales, procurement, investor and press lanes run on different surfaces and are not yet measured.
Your brand isn't measured yet
What does an AI agent do with your website?
The same measurement as Munich Re, free for your domain. Five agent classes, one real task, your score in 48 hours.
Producer surface survives. Brokers own the close.
Wave 9 measured Munich Re Property Cat XL Treaty Reinsurance across Cody Gate-1 (3 providers, 18 datapoints, German queries, 0 errors). a fleet wave is queued for Wave 9b — Usability axis on this wave reflects structural defaults for the catalog_only B2B reinsurance close. The munichre.com surface carries the capacity statement (Munich Re is one of the two largest reinsurers in the world), the underwriting-line description, and NatCatSERVICE peril data as a public-facing differentiator. The brand surface is text-readable and code-extractable for the line description; the per-breed access profile under a real agent-fleet test lands in Wave 9b. The renewal cycle for European primary insurers running 1 January placements is intermediated by Aon, Guy Carpenter, and Gallagher Re — these are the channels that surface in agent shortlists when a Property Cat XL capacity query is asked, and the channel that the buyer actually transacts through.
One label, many breeds. From a plain reader to an autonomous operator, the kinds behind ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Claude Code:
Found, and able to transact?
Two questions, measured separately. A brand can be recommended and still un-buyable, or perfectly buyable and never found.
When someone asks an agent to secure Property Cat XL Treaty capacity, does it route to Munich Re?
Munich Re comes up about four times in ten. The rest of the time, an agent recommends an alternative first.
Discoverability · 18-datapoint auditOnce an agent is on Munich Re's site, can it reach a broker-submission pathway for a Property Cat XL Treaty renewal?
Search-class agents surface a quote in some runs; the full agent-fleet access profile lands in a later wave.
Evidence · 65 / 100 A measure of how provable and consistent the result is, grounded in cross-method ground-truth agreement (the methods that ran returned the same price), not a separate measured run. A confidence layer on the two scores above, not a third sales axis.
What this means for Munich Re.
On product discovery, Munich Re is not lacking findability — the brand is one of the two largest reinsurers in the world, named in every reinsurance-capacity question by construction. The gap is not the brand-own surface. It is the B2B reinsurance procurement mode: the renewal cycle for Property Cat XL Treaty placements does not run on a public-facing self-service flow. It runs through the broker layer (Aon, Guy Carpenter, Gallagher Re). The agent reaches munichre.com, reads the line description and the capacity statement, then routes the broker submission. Munich Re owns the capacity story, the broker owns the placement.
What changes the outcome is closing the surface-to-broker gap. The brand-own page surfaces the capacity story cleanly. The remaining lever is on the channel side: the agent reads the munichre.com line description, then has to identify the right reinsurance broker to submit through. Named Hyperize offerings here: Answer Pages on "Welche Rückversicherer bieten Property Cat XL Capacity für DACH-Erstversicherer?" that route directly to the brand-own line description plus the broker-channel discovery, and Reference Pages that make Munich Re's named instruments (NatCatSERVICE, Risk Suite, the line-of-business taxonomy) agent-readable rather than human-readable. If your brand sits behind brokers, distributors, or tied agents, this is the AI test that decides whether agents reach you first or your channel does.
The proof isn't more content. It's a repeatable lift in whether agents find, verify, cite, recommend, and complete the brand journey directly — re-measured each wave.
Commission an audit.
Where the BrandScore opens the question, an audit closes it. An interpretive engagement on your full surface, scored under the same methodology.
Get the auditFound with us.
Strategic partnership for brands building agent success as a long-term capability, not a one-off engagement.
ApplyAudit an adjacent property.
The BrandScore covers the primary domain. Get the same methodology applied to an adjacent property: a country site, a sub-brand, a category beyond the DAX-40 slate.
Get a SnapshotThis is Munich Re. What about your brand?
You just saw how an AI agent treats a DAX 40 brand.
The same measurement runs free against your domain: five agent classes, one real buying task, your Agent Success Score in 48 hours, in the exact format of this page.
Reinsurance brokers like Aon, Guy Carpenter, and Gallagher Re capture 70% of reinsurance demand before Munich Re.
Third-Party Interception derived from Cody Gate-1 response analysis: the B2B reinsurance procurement mode applies. Property Cat XL Treaty placements route through reinsurance brokers (Aon, Guy Carpenter, Gallagher Re) — the structural intermediary layer for the 1 January renewal cycle that the agent surfaces alongside Munich Re's direct capacity statement.
Intermediaries Aon · Guy Carpenter · Gallagher Re
Hyperize-selected tasks.
One task from the public sector grid. Task list is frozen before each wave runs.
Munich Re Property Cat XL Treaty Reinsurance (European primary insurer, 1 January renewal placement)
- Close state
- a quote
- Bottleneck
- Producer page surfaces the capacity statement; reinsurance-broker intermediation (Aon / Guy Carpenter / Gallagher Re) captures the placement close.
Fairness note
Wave 9 Q2 2026 partial measurement. Single task (Munich Re Property Cat XL Treaty Reinsurance, quote_ready close, European primary insurer 1 January renewal placement). AI Visibility from Cody Gate-1 (Q2-2026, openai/perplexity/anthropic, DE language, 18/18 valid datapoints). AI Usability axis pending a fleet wave (queued Wave 9b) — current Usability score reflects structural defaults for the catalog_only B2B reinsurance close, not a measured per-breed access profile. Fairness Review pending the sector fairness grid.
How the score was produced.
Discoverability is audit-pipeline-derived. 3-provider sample (openai, perplexity, anthropic), 3 query variants per task, 2 runs per variant · 18 valid datapoints scored against a five-state handoff cascade. [S1]
AI Usability is derived from the access-profile above (usability-derivation/v1): how far the best agent reached (close state) modulated by how many agent classes succeeded. The per-class profile is the truth; the score is a reproducible summary of it, not a separate rating. Fleet phases (HTTP / Coding / Browser / ACT) produce the profile. [S2]
Agent Success Score = (AI Visibility × 0.20) + (AI Usability × 0.70) + (Evidence × 0.10)
On a 0–100 scale, displayed 0–10. AI Usability bundles the agent's reach + completion; AI Visibility is audit-derived discoverability. Weighting is public; the per-prompt derivation is not.
Measurement scope
Confidence C · one measured task on a 3-provider track (openai, perplexity, anthropic). Confidence promotes to B with a second task plus a fourth provider on the next wave.
Measurement timeline.
Each wave appends; nothing overwrites. Frozen Wave Rule.
- Entry · 01
26 May 2026
Wave · ProtocolWAVE-Q2-2026-W9-REINSURANCE
ars-methodology/v1.1
Wave 9 partial measurement landed. Cody Gate-1 complete (18/18 valid, 0 errors). a fleet wave queued for Wave 9b — Usability axis on this wave reflects structural defaults for the catalog_only B2B reinsurance close. Producer-page survival of the capacity statement confirmed by Cody response analysis; broker-intermediation channel position derived from Cody response texts (Aon / Guy Carpenter / Gallagher Re dominate the placement layer).
Evidence and provenance.
Public methodology references and internal evidence pointers behind every claim above.
- [S1]Accessed · 26 May 2026
Gate-1 audit run · Munich Re Wave Q2 2026 (Cody, dispatched 2026-05-26)
Internal · Hyperize evidence
- · AI Visibility score
- · the close state reached (quote_ready)
- [S2]Accessed · 26 May 2026
a fleet wave reinsurance wave · Munich Re phase 1-4 (queued Wave 9b)
Internal · Hyperize evidence
- · the per-breed access profile (Wave 9b)
- Accessed · 26 May 2026
Public · hyperize.ai
- · fairness declaration
- · Third-Party Interception framing
Read the doctrine. Challenge the score. Extend the slate.
Task Selection.
The fairness doctrine behind the slate above. Five failure modes, six criteria, public before each wave.
Read ChallengeDisagree with this score.
Send evidence under public Fairness Review. Failed reviews are documented with the named failure mode.
Challenge ExtendSubmit your own task.
Open Surface Run · additive measurement. The Hyperize-selected slate stays frozen; your task gets the same methodology.
SubmitEditorial coverage
The DAX 40 Agent Success Index is a point-in-time snapshot of the agent-success of public digital touchpoints. Results are not statements about product quality, company performance, service quality, or the legal obligations of the brands named. Brand names and logos remain the property of their respective owners and are used solely for identification and reporting purposes in the context of editorial coverage (§ 23 MarkenG, Art. 5 GG).
Brands wishing to respond, engage, or correct a factual error may contact hello@hyperize.ai. Responses received are published in full alongside the findings. Full methodology and editorial-coverage notice: coverage statement.
